Kyiv’s Restaurant Business in Winter 2026: Who Is Closing and What Comes Next
The beginning of 2026 exposed one of the most painful pressure points of Kyiv’s urban economy the restaurant business. Severe морозs, regular power outages, and a sharp drop in foot traffic hit establishments simultaneously, many of which were already operating under constant stress. As a result, dozens of restaurants and cafés have either closed or gone on so-called “holidays” with no clear return dates.
According to market participants, up to 20% of Kyiv’s restaurants could leave the market by spring. This figure is not official statistics but a synthesis of what is happening on the ground: businesses without financial buffers, generators pushed beyond their limits, and owners who no longer have the personal resources to operate in a state of permanent uncertainty. It is important to note that this is not a sudden collapse, but a gradual process of exhaustion. In any large city, 15–20% of restaurants typically do not survive their first year. This is a natural selection process driven by weak concepts, poor locations, or declining quality. During a crisis, these projects are usually the first to disappear. However, the current wave of closures in Kyiv goes beyond this “normal” market cycle.
Today, it is not only weak players leaving the market. Even successful, well-known restaurants are shutting down, despite having operated steadily just a year ago. In many cases, the reason is not purely financial but human. Constant shelling, prolonged life without predictability, and responsibility for teams and businesses under such conditions lead to emotional burnout. In these cases, closing a restaurant is not a sign of failure, but a recognition of personal limits. It is also important to distinguish between temporary closures and permanent exits. Many establishments have chosen to temporarily suspend operations. From a business perspective, this is a rational decision: why lose large sums every day when visitor numbers have dropped dramatically? The real concern lies elsewhere the absence of clear reopening dates. When a restaurant announces “holidays” without further explanation, it often signals uncertainty rather than a planned pause. The reasons behind the drop in foot traffic are clear. There are simply fewer people in the city: some have left abroad, others moved out of Kyiv, and many families with children relocated during the cold months and intensified attacks. Tourist flows are virtually nonexistent. Those who remain spend more cautiously and go out less often, affected by weather conditions, icy streets, and increasingly uncomfortable conditions inside venues.
At the same time, consumer behavior has changed rather than disappeared. Food delivery has grown, indicating that people have not stopped eating outside their homes they have changed the format. However, delivery cannot fully compensate for the losses of restaurants that rely on in-house dining, atmosphere, and social experience. The energy crisis merely intensified problems that had been building for years. Rising food costs, higher wages, and a chronic labor shortage have significantly increased operating expenses. Generators, once a backup solution, have become a daily necessity. For small venues, this means several thousand hryvnias per day; for larger establishments, 20,000–30,000 hryvnias daily. During severe cold spells, even powerful systems struggle: dining rooms remain cold, and guests are unwilling to sit in winter coats.
The end of the year proved especially painful. December traditionally allowed restaurants to build a financial cushion for winter through corporate events, holidays, and high traffic. At the end of 2025, this did not happen. Many establishments entered January already drained, without reserves. As a result, foot traffic dropped by 30–40% compared to December, and by roughly half compared to January of the previous year. Despite all this, the market does not appear entirely broken. There is a “golden league” of about 10–15% of establishments. These businesses have scale, strong brands, and loyal audiences. They are under pressure and earning less, but they continue to operate and remain anchors of urban life. The greatest risks are concentrated in the mid-range segment and in projects with weak locations.
“Time for Action” analyzed the market and identified a key detail: the current crisis is not only about losses, but also about regrouping. Rental prices are already declining, quality premises are becoming available, and a new map of opportunities is emerging. Notably, the most active players are entrepreneurs from the regions, including frontline areas. For them, Kyiv appears to be a difficult but promising market where niches can still be claimed. Therefore, the key question is not how many restaurants will close, but what kind of establishments will replace them. Will the city become less saturated but more thoughtful? Will the logic of the restaurant business shift from emotional, owner-driven projects to pragmatic models adapted to prolonged instability? The winter of 2026 has become a test of endurance. Spring will show who passed that test and what the new restaurant Kyiv will look like.
About the Author
