The US-EU $800B Ukraine recovery plan: what the document really means and why it is not money yet
Information about a postwar recovery plan for Ukraine worth $800 billion, allegedly proposed by the United States and the European Union, created the impression that the West is already ready to launch large-scale investments. In reality, this is not an agreement, not funding, and not the start of reconstruction. It is a conceptual document that describes a possible scenario after the end of the war. The project was reported by Politico, which obtained an 18-page document circulated by the European Commission among EU governments ahead of a summit. The document has no legal force and contains no financial obligations.
The $800 billion figure is not a budget and not a financial aid package. It is a target how much funding could theoretically be mobilized over a long period of time if all conditions are met. The structure looks as follows:
- around $500 billion expected mobilization of public and private capital from the US, the EU, and international financial institutions;
- €100 billion planned budget support from the European Union within its 2028–2034 seven-year budget;
- another €207 billion investments that could appear thanks to guarantees, not direct funding.
The key word here is could. Most of this amount does not exist as real money.
The main condition is an end to the war
The document is directly tied to a ceasefire. As long as hostilities continue, the plan cannot be implemented. This is openly acknowledged by BlackRock, which is involved in preparing the plan as a consultant. The company is not investing and does not guarantee financing. Its role is analytical. The position is simple: it is impossible to invest in a country under constant shelling. That is why all large figures in the document are linked to the future, not the present.
The plan mentions a 100-day launch phase. This does not mean the start of construction or the arrival of investors. It refers to preparation:
- setting up coordination bodies;
- selecting project pipelines;
- establishing rules and procedures.
This is organizational work that only makes sense once the security situation stabilizes.
The role of the United States in the plan
The document changes the approach to the role of the United States. Washington is presented not as a donor, but as:
- a strategic economic partner;
- a source of credibility for business;
- a mobilizer of private capital.
US companies are expected to participate in energy, infrastructure, technology, and critical minerals projects. But again after the war ends.
This is not a peace deal and not a guarantee of peace
The “prosperity plan” is the economic part of a broader peace framework that the US is trying to align between Ukraine and Russia. It:
- does not contain military solutions;
- does not define security guarantees;
- does not resolve territorial issues.
This means the document does not end the war and does not replace political negotiations. It only outlines what could happen to Ukraine’s economy if the war ends.
Why nothing was signed in Davos
Reports about a “canceled signing” in Davos created a false impression. In reality:
- no agreement existed;
- there was no document ready for signing;
- the plan never envisioned formal approval at the forum.
It is an internal strategic proposal, not an international treaty.
What this means in practice
As of now, this plan:
- does not bring money into the economy;
- does not start reconstruction;
- does not create obligations for investors.
It serves a different purpose to show how the West sees Ukraine after the war, and under what conditions it would be ready to invest large sums. As long as shelling continues, the $800 billion remains a figure on paper. Real reconstruction will begin not with presentations and plans, but with the basic condition the end of the war.
About the Author
